2 thoughts on “How do you think the best advertisers are not in the advertising industry?”
Guy
In fact, I have always had a lot of confusion. With my current superficial cognition, aside from the boundaries of the industry, it seems that all those who involve spreading can be called “advertisers”. From this broad perspective, I think that everything can become “advertising.” After all, “spread” is a very social concept. In this way, if you want to answer the question of the subject, you must first discuss the concept. How do you think the best advertisers are not in the advertising industry? I think first of all, should we talk about whether advertisers who are not in the advertising industry can still call it “advertiser”? Judging from the existing public opinion, the “advertiser” seems to have become a very fixed label. At least, most of the “advertisers” discussed in public opinion are generally active in the advertising industry. In the past few years, they have opened the way with “creativity” to build themselves into very representative times. They are fashionable, pioneers, flexible minds, and creativity. They are synonymous with new human beings. Now, there are a group of “advertisers”. They are good at “advertising dogs”, especially “overtime”, complaints about boss, and the closure of customers. The relationship is widely active on various social media platforms, creating the image of another advertiser. This is the group image of the advertiser. Although it is not possible to answer this question positively, it also gives this question a reference in a certain sense from the side. That is, “what kind of person is an advertiser”, at least it has changed from public opinion. The so -called “advertiser” should at least refer to “people who can use advertising to solve some problems.” So the question is, what is “advertising means”? Generally, what we think of advertising, in the era of traditional advertising, is especially the “wide -to -be” “advertisement” of the four major media (television, newspapers, radio, and magazines). They generally have some specific form, so that people know it is advertising at a glance. As advertising practitioners, the so -called TVC, print advertisements, broadcast advertisements, direct mail advertising, etc. also have a fixed business form. With the advancement of media technology, emerging Internet media has developed, and the relationship between the two parties between people is increasingly becoming a mesh relationship, and the form of advertising has begun to undergo qualitative changes. A series of advertising forms such as native advertisements have risen, and the boundaries between “content” and “advertising” are becoming more and more blurred. Advertising becomes softer and more diverse and more diverse. So that the position of advertising practitioners is becoming more and more extensive. More and more non -advertising companies have begun to engage in advertising work. E -commerce, the media, and even the various departments of Party A. They involve the work scope of the advertising is no longer just participating in a part of the entire advertising industry chain. Create advertisements like that. At this time, where is the boundary of the advertising industry? This is another question worth pondering.
The best advertisers will be produced in each era. The best one is never the previous one, but the next. I don’t agree with the best advertiser is the dead Ogway (of course he is excellent, is it best to be better) and there is no standard. Then Kawaka Pauli, Yamamoto Yamamoto, Ando Zhongxiong or Kurhaas, they are not advertisers, of course, they are not in the advertising industry. Then, each industry has the best opportunity to be born, don’t worry, and don’t have to define it. I believe the best advertiser is in the future. After all, this is an era of change, isn’t it? But I really want to ask you to figure out the definition of “advertisers”. Is your creativity? Operation? sell? Anyway, Kawasamoto must not be advertisers.
In fact, I have always had a lot of confusion. With my current superficial cognition, aside from the boundaries of the industry, it seems that all those who involve spreading can be called “advertisers”. From this broad perspective, I think that everything can become “advertising.” After all, “spread” is a very social concept. In this way, if you want to answer the question of the subject, you must first discuss the concept. How do you think the best advertisers are not in the advertising industry? I think first of all, should we talk about whether advertisers who are not in the advertising industry can still call it “advertiser”? Judging from the existing public opinion, the “advertiser” seems to have become a very fixed label. At least, most of the “advertisers” discussed in public opinion are generally active in the advertising industry. In the past few years, they have opened the way with “creativity” to build themselves into very representative times. They are fashionable, pioneers, flexible minds, and creativity. They are synonymous with new human beings. Now, there are a group of “advertisers”. They are good at “advertising dogs”, especially “overtime”, complaints about boss, and the closure of customers. The relationship is widely active on various social media platforms, creating the image of another advertiser. This is the group image of the advertiser. Although it is not possible to answer this question positively, it also gives this question a reference in a certain sense from the side. That is, “what kind of person is an advertiser”, at least it has changed from public opinion. The so -called “advertiser” should at least refer to “people who can use advertising to solve some problems.” So the question is, what is “advertising means”? Generally, what we think of advertising, in the era of traditional advertising, is especially the “wide -to -be” “advertisement” of the four major media (television, newspapers, radio, and magazines). They generally have some specific form, so that people know it is advertising at a glance. As advertising practitioners, the so -called TVC, print advertisements, broadcast advertisements, direct mail advertising, etc. also have a fixed business form. With the advancement of media technology, emerging Internet media has developed, and the relationship between the two parties between people is increasingly becoming a mesh relationship, and the form of advertising has begun to undergo qualitative changes. A series of advertising forms such as native advertisements have risen, and the boundaries between “content” and “advertising” are becoming more and more blurred. Advertising becomes softer and more diverse and more diverse. So that the position of advertising practitioners is becoming more and more extensive. More and more non -advertising companies have begun to engage in advertising work. E -commerce, the media, and even the various departments of Party A. They involve the work scope of the advertising is no longer just participating in a part of the entire advertising industry chain. Create advertisements like that. At this time, where is the boundary of the advertising industry? This is another question worth pondering.
The best advertisers will be produced in each era. The best one is never the previous one, but the next. I don’t agree with the best advertiser is the dead Ogway (of course he is excellent, is it best to be better) and there is no standard. Then Kawaka Pauli, Yamamoto Yamamoto, Ando Zhongxiong or Kurhaas, they are not advertisers, of course, they are not in the advertising industry. Then, each industry has the best opportunity to be born, don’t worry, and don’t have to define it. I believe the best advertiser is in the future. After all, this is an era of change, isn’t it? But I really want to ask you to figure out the definition of “advertisers”. Is your creativity? Operation? sell? Anyway, Kawasamoto must not be advertisers.